Senior State counsel Mohammed Adow for Attorney General leaving court of appeal after the Court ruled regulatory sanctions imposed by the government on cigarette manufacturers were reasonable and justified on Friday February 17 ,2017 (PHOTO BY SAM).

Attorney General has urged Supreme Court to dismiss case by British American Tobacco (BAT) challenging court of appeal decision that upheld sanctions imposed by the Government on cigarette manufacturers and importers to safeguard public health are justified.

“This Court should dismiss and penalize the BAT for wasting precious judicial time and clogging the rights of genuine litigants that are kept at bay” urged AG.

Senior State Counsel Mohamad Adow told supreme court that tobacco use and consumption interferes with all human vital organs such as the brain, lungs, heart, liver and kidney and causes diseases, disability and death and it affects the health and lives of the present and future generations.

“Tobacco control and regulation is a global practice. Kenya being a respectable member of the international community and a party to WHO FCTC cannot be exceptional” said Adow.

Mr Adow told supreme Court the purpose of the regulation is to protect the global citizens, those who smoke and those who do not, from the harmful effects of tobacco consumption and use by informing them the effects of the same as per our bill of rights.

This was during a hearing following their appeal at the Supreme Court challenging the court of appeal’s decision that dismissed their petition to stop tougher tobacco control measures that included graphic warning and annual levies to treat cancer patients.

Through lawyer Kiragu Kimani, BAT said the government did not follow the proper regulatory process.

“The appellant has no difficulty of being regulated provided the regulation is in accordance with constitution, in reasonable and evidence based”, Kiragu said.

He told chief justice David Maraga that they did not appeal to revisit the regulation.

Kiragu accused the health CS that he failed to conduct adequate public participation and stakeholder’s consultation.

“Public participation cannot be taken lightly. Those who were involved had actually raised concern and had recommended that the process should be repeated. There was no impact assessment that was conducted”, BAT said.

He said growing and manufacturing of cigarette is a lawful business and conducted by many other countries and a solution has been introduced as a tax though it’s not clear how this will be used as compensation.

However the Health ministry through state counsel Mohamed Adow successfully argued that BAT had already complied with the regulations as cigarette packets with graphic warnings are already in the market.

Adow said the court is justifiable to limit the regulations and urged the court to reject the appeal and uphold the regulations because it will help in the health of citizens of the country.

Chief justice Maraga who heard the case together with Deputy CJ Philomena Mwilu, Justices Smokin Wanjala, Njoki Ndungu and Jackton Ojwang’ said the judgement will be delivered on notice.

In February 2017, BAT lost their appeal seeking nine months to implement health warnings contained in the 2014 Tobacco Control Regulations, which took effect in September last year.

They claimed it would cost about Sh93 million in one financial year to print the prescribed health warnings in order to comply with the regulations.

The three-Judge bench held that the Health ministry regulations satisfied statutory and constitutional requirements since their enactment was preceded by exhaustive consultations with all tobacco industry players and public participation.

The Appellate bench upheld the decision made on March 24, last year, by High Court Judge Mumbi Ngugi giving the greenlight to the Health ministry to fully implement the legal provisions.